Village Groupism — The Need of the Hour for the Kuki-Zo Community

In times of uncertainty and conflict, communities often rediscover the power of collective strength. For the Kuki-Zo community, the present reality marked by displacement, fragile security, and disrupted livelihoods has made village-level solidarity not merely desirable but necessary. “Village groupism,” when understood as organised community cohesion rather than exclusionary identity politics, can serve as a practical framework for survival, resilience, and rebuilding.

Article 371C of the Indian Constitution and the Tribal Communities of Manipur

 Constitutional Safeguards, Institutional Practice, and Contemporary Challenges

Abstract

Article 371C of the Indian Constitution was introduced as a special provision to safeguard the political, administrative, and cultural interests of the tribal communities inhabiting the hill areas of Manipur. Enacted in the context of Manipur’s transition to statehood, the provision sought to institutionalise participatory governance through the Hill Areas Committee (HAC) and to assign special responsibility to the Governor for hill administration. Despite its constitutional significance, Article 371C has remained under-implemented and institutionally weakened. This paper examines the historical origins, constitutional intent, institutional mechanisms, and practical limitations of Article 371C, situating it within Manipur’s broader ethnic and governance landscape. It argues that the erosion of Article 371C has contributed to tribal alienation and governance crises, and that strengthening its implementation is essential for democratic legitimacy and ethnic accommodation in Manipur.